CamelBak H.A.W.G Pro 20
Words Lester Perry
Images Henry Jaine
RRP $299
Distributor Southern Approach
There’s a particular style of trip where bike bags strapped to your frame either aren’t suitable for the route you’re attempting or simply don’t provide enough capacity for the required gear.
When Kieran Bennett and I took on our ‘Starevall or Bust’ two-day mission in the summer of 2024, we had an Aeroe handlebar cradle and dry bag each. That was handy — but with the trail being steep and technical in many places, the option for a rear rack was off the cards, and frame bags would have had to be custom made for our full-suspension rigs (and even then, wouldn’t provide the capacity we needed). CamelBak’s range of Packs was the answer — in my case, the H.A.W.G Pro 20, while Kieran went with a similar, but smaller, MULE Pro 14.
The H.A.W.G pack is designed precisely with missions like ours in mind. Twenty litres capacity, supplied with a 3-litre bladder, and room for another if needed. I opted for a single 3L bladder and a water filter, which, if you’ve read the trip report, you’ll know was a necessity!
Stowage is split into three main areas; nearest to the body is the hydration bladder sleeve. Outside of this, another large ‘full’ pocket features two large internal pockets, one of which is designed to hold a spare eBike battery if you’re that way inclined. In this section, there was enough capacity for me to stow a dry Merino top, a pair of shorts and a couple of freeze-dried meals. A smaller zipped pocket is on the left side of the back panel, down near the waist belt, although I didn’t use it on our trip. It would be ideal for smaller bits you may need to take with you but do not necessarily need easy access to — for example, a wallet or passport.
The next layer out has a medium-sized pocket featuring a couple of smaller zipped mesh pockets to store little items — in my case, tools and spares behind the zips, and some snacks in the main compartment. Across the top, there’s a fleece-lined pocket that is ideal for stowing glasses – and is large enough for goggles.
The outside of the pack features a stretch compartment, ideal for items that you might need quick access to — in my case, a jacket and bag of trail mix, and a First Aid Kit that we fortunately never required. The clips on either side have small hooks to clip helmet straps to for carrying.
Weight is supported on the hips with a sturdy waist belt and, handily, there’s a zipped pocket on each side for quick access to gear when you don’t want to remove the pack to access. There’s a good amount of room in these pockets. I stashed a disposable camera on the left side for quick access and, on the right, I had some lollies, a multi-tool and a tyre plugger.
The H.A.W.G Pro is the first pack I’ve used with the Air Support Pro Back Panel — a 3D mesh back and harness that supports the bulk of the pack, holding it away from your body as much as is feasible, allowing for maximal airflow between the wearer and the pack. Although it’s still noticeably warmer than no pack, thanks to the Air Support back panel, it feels much cooler than some smaller, more traditional packs I’ve used. The back panel provides a level of rigidity to the whole system and, combined with the harness setup (including the sternum strap), secures the entire pack nicely. It’s well supported, even while fully loaded and tackling rough terrain. Thanks to the secure fit and rigidity, the top of the pack works well for resting the bike on while carrying over hike-a-bike sections — something we spent hours doing while hiking up Mt Starveall.
Two straps wrap around the base of the pack and, once cinched down, they help compress the load, helping keep everything in place; handily, they’re long enough to strap on more gear. In my case, I secured my Thermarest Sleeping Mat to the base and saved valuable volume in the pack itself. There’s myriad uses for these simple straps: tent poles, rolled-up jackets, or (most importantly) baguettes — the possibilities are endless.
The pack is supplied with a snazzy little tool roll and, while it’s great in theory, I found I couldn’t get my preferred selection of tools and bits to play nicely with it. The tool roll stayed home while on the Starveall mission, and I brought my small tool bag along.
As far as hydration goes, I can’t fault the 3-litre ‘Crux’ bladder. Although I’m not a super fan of the huge screw top, it does the trick and is long forgotten once it’s tucked safely into the pack. CamelBak redeemed themselves with their market-leading (in my opinion) bite valve and “magnetic tube trap” that keeps the drinking hose nicely secure when not in use, and snaps easily back into place.
The only niggle I’ve found with the H.A.W.G is on the outer stretch compartment. The clips that secure each side and help compress the load are not a traditional bag clip design, I assume, to allow for the helmet hooks. More than once, I had issues getting the clip to close correctly on my first attempt; unless the clips are aligned perfectly, one side can stick out and not be clicked into place correctly. This led to the clips popping open a few times on our trip. It’s annoying but not the end of the world. With some attention, they work fine and are secure when clipped correctly.
When all’s said and done, I’m a big fan of the CamelBak H.A.W.G and its versatility. It’s large enough for an overnighter, and once cinched down, it’s compact and lightweight enough for just a few hours in the backcountry without feeling like you’re carrying a flappy, half empty pack.
Inno Tire Hold HD Rack
Words & Images Cameron Mackenzie
RRP $1249
Distributor Racks NZ
The concept of a platform bike rack is nothing new, with many of today’s mainstay manufacturers producing several different models each.
Whilst common, there’s seems to be a new brand on the block every other month, each offering a bigger, beefier and “better” option than the other guy – and Inno’s no exception. Up until recently, Inno is a brand I’d not heard of, let alone knew was available in the local market, but I quickly took notice when I stumbled upon their latest Tire Hold HD rack, offering what looked to be a significantly sturdier rack than anything else I’d seen thus far.
Bike racks have been a pain point of mine over the last few years – never seeming to get more than two years out of a Yakima rack before it bends, breaks and/or rusts past the point of safe use. Whilst the way I use it – leaving it attached to the back of my truck year-round and lapping the country in search of the perfect MTB photo – may be a hard life for a rack, they’re a tool, and I expect more. I mean, who has the time or strength to be lifting their 25+kg rack on and off the car and into the garage for storage between weekend Woodhill trips?
Inno’s latest offering, the Tire Hold HD rack, steps things up, offering large weight carrying capabilities, a wide range of tyre size compatibility, and a design that removes any frame contact – one which, up until 2015, was unavailable on a rack outside of the US.
Fitting Inno’s rack onto my truck was a relatively straightforward affair, although, it did require a few small mods to make it all play nice. The rack features a little depth stopper that helps hold the hitch in the same place – presumably for easy alignment as you take it in and out – which I had to remove in order to get the pin holes to align. Their locking pin has a moulded plastic handle, but is of such a size that it prevented it from being able to be threaded in. Removing the plastic handle from the bolt (albeit forcefully) sorted the problem, and it now threads in easily utilising the 8mm hex key head.
As my bike quiver has evolved, so too have my requirements for a bike rack, so the idea of a rack built largely out of aluminium, with the ability to carry up to 34kgs per bike, hold strong and handle off-road use held big appeal.
The strength of the rack is clear when looking at the size of the hardware and pivots featured throughout. The main pivot, which allows the rack to fold, features no-play and is actuated by a smooth and easily accessed grab-handle at the further-most end of the rack. Whilst elements of the plastic components used throughout make me a little nervous, the cowling encasing the main pivot is a welcome sight, helping to keep a lot of the nasty road grime and dust away from one of the key parts of this system.
Loading bikes is where this system shines. With the way in which the ratcheting arms work, the arms stay put once extended, allowing for one arm to be set in position, a bike rolled or placed up against said arm, and the last arm folded up and tensioned using one hand.
Unloading requires a little more coordination and the use of both hands. I find you need to pull the arm back towards the centre of your bike to take the pressure off of the ratchet, and have your other hand depress the release switch on the tray. My only gripe with this is that the ratchet mechanism requires you to keep the level pressed in whilst you slide the arm back, at times leading to you ending up in some creative body positions.
The tyre holders/arms feature a hard-plastic cup which acts as the key point of contact against the tyres and needs to be adjusted depending on the size of your wheels. Doing so is straightforward, but isn’t something you’d want to be doing each time you load your bike. As in our case, if you have a mullet-wheeled bike, or ‘his and hers’ with varying wheel sizes, you find yourself placing the bikes on the rack in the same order and orientation each time to avoid any hassle.
Each carrier bolts onto the main arm of the rack using a t-track style system (similar to what you’d find on roof rack type bike carriers), which allows for close to 30cm of fore-aft adjustment. This range of movement in pairing with the ability to place your bike anywhere on the carrier and adjust the balance of the arms to affect its position means the days of bikes mating is all but over.
Where other racks would creak and rattle, Inno’s HD rack hasn’t made a peep. Even with 45kgs of carbon and lithium swinging off the back down rough, corrugated gravel roads and mild 4×4 tracks, the bikes held rock solid and would barely wobble even, as the truck bounced around. Long journeys are much the same – hassle free and without movement.
The Tire Hold HD is designed exclusively around a 2-Inch hitch, so for those using a smaller hitch receiver or a tow ball, you’re out of luck when it comes to running this heavy-duty bit of kit. Inno offer similar models using a lot of the same materials and construction, but only for those whose vehicles don either a 1-1/4” or 2” hitch. For the towballer’s, sadly you’ll be needing to look elsewhere for the time being.
The ability to lock your bikes onto your rack is a feature you tend not to utilise all that often, but is one which you want to be well thought out and reliable when you need it. Unfortunately for the Tire Hold HD rack, the locking solution is the one feature which really lets it down. Their solution to security is a basic double-loop cable which requires being fed through itself on one end, and the other being clamped down by the hitch’s expanding wedge handle. The cable itself is something out of a primary school bike rack and wouldn’t take much to cut through or pull out of the locked handle. With the bike rack loaded, locking the cable in place would require you reach underneath the rack and fiddle around with a small key, realigning the handle on a small spline, and clamping said cable loop in place.
An easy solution would be to buy an aftermarket bike-lock and chain the bikes together, but for $1249, you’d hope they could come up with a better solution – perhaps wheels locks like the ones found on the Rocky Mounts or 1Up models.
My only other peeve of Inno’s rack is the inability to expand the carrying capacity after the fact. The Tire Hold HD is available in a two or four bike model, but neither option can be changed with the purchase or removal of an extension. Having that ability is helpful both ways – being able to shorten it for around town when it’s just you, or being able to take a car full of friends on riding trips, without the need to have two racks sitting in the garage.
Time will tell how well the Inno rack lasts but, for now, I’ll be keeping this one fitted, at least until I need to carry more than two bikes – and will be carrying my own lock.
CamelBak M.U.L.E Pro 14
Words Liam Friary
Images Henry Jaine
RRP $279
Distributor Southern Approach
I’m always scheming or planning an overnight trip, particularly during that time between the clocks springing forward and winding back again (boooo!). How much gear we actually need on a trip, and what we are going to use to carry it, is always a big consideration.
I don’t mind having some weight on my bike, but I always like to try and keep it free to move, so having a decent backpack with enough storage is an absolute must. Extra hydration is also key when pedaling off into the backcountry for hours and days at a time, making a reservoir a must have. For these trips you need to pack ya meals, snacks, layers, jackets, power bank and locator beacon at the very least, along with other essentials.
The M.U.L.E Pro 14 is aimed at big days out and comes with loads of genuinely useful storage arrays. The back panel is most excellently called ‘Air Support’ and really does help reduce sweaty back syndrome. It also features the brilliant Crux Reservoir which holds three litres of water. As well as a compartmentalised main storage chamber, the M.U.L.E. Pro 14 has a hip belt with cargo carrying capability (another must) and a removable bike tool organiser wrap thingy. You can also insert optional ‘Impact Protector’ spine protection armour into the pack.
When loaded up and out on the trail, the CamelBak M.U.L.E. Pro 14 isn’t that noticeable — and that’s a good thing! For a very spacious pack, it’s just so damn comfy – no pesky annoyances. The combo of stability and security is adequate without having to wrench the bag around my torso. My overnighter stuff was all packed into the CamelBak M.U.L.E Pro without hassle and if you need to pack a sleeping bag you can do that, thanks to two straps that have little hooks on them; I used these to secure my sleeping bag to the bottom of it. Again, when riding, the bag felt snug and secure — I could feel its weight, but it was well distributed. All contact points for the bag have been carefully considered, with each strap being made up of a cross-hatched mesh, along with a sponge centre for maximum ventilation. The traditional shoulder straps have a runner system for easy adjustment of the chest strap too, which reduces that cutting sensation on the armpits which can be a bloody nuisance with an ill-fitting and heavy backpack.
The M.U.L.E Pro 14 hosts a very spacious 3L bladder suitable for whatever your trail adventure. The reservoir is easily accessible via a full-length zip down one side of the bag — the bladder can be removed and refilled with ease, thanks to its helpful handle design and large opening towards the top. The quick release hose connection reduces faff in feeding it in and is great for cleaning as well. The drinking tube has a magnet on it, so it stays secure while you ride. I think the magnet is great for making a solid connection but, when riding and moving, you need to twist it – which can be a touch difficult.
Overall, the light open mesh absolutely lets the back breath whilst remaining secure. The hip straps and lumbar pad really help distribute the weight nicely. A handy addition is the mesh pocket on either side – big enough for a multi tool or snacks for quick and easy access. The best pocket, though, is the sneaky one on the left-hand side of the pack where the waist strap meets the bag. This little pocket is well protected and will fit your cell phone for snapping memorable moments. It meets all my requirements for storage space and stows enough water. The comfort reigns supreme and it does its job very well. Now, I just have to find some more time for backcountry missions?!
Trek Top Fuel
Words Liam Friary
Images Cameron Mackenzie
RRP$15,499
Distributor Trek New Zealand
The lines are somewhat blurred between an XC long-travel bike and a lightweight trail bike but, regardless of categorisation, the bike is designed to be super-adjustable with a redesigned frame and a 4-position Mino Link. There’s also a ton more you can customise, like wheel size, geometry, and suspension travel, making it super appealing for everyday trail riding, or even XC racing duties.
Trek has opted for refinement rather than revision – a trend the industry is increasingly embracing. Generally, bikes are in a good place regarding geometry numbers, so there’s no need to reinvent the wheel – at least for now. While the new Top Fuel looks similar to the previous generation, it has gone on a slight diet with about a 100g savings in the carbon frame, and employing slimmed-down tubes across the entire frame. The new 4-position flip chip, used for adjusting the bike’s geometry or the amount of shock progression, is located at the lower shock mount. This flip chip offers High/Low geometry settings that modify the angles by 0.5° and change the BB height by 6mm. Additionally, you can move the suspension leverage rate forward and backward with the flip chip. The forward position offers 14% progression, while the rear position offers 19%, providing more ramp-up at the end of stroke. I rode mainly with the rear, more progressive position and found it better suited to my riding style and the terrain where testing was done.
I appreciate the ability to change out the rear and front travel if desired. The rear shock is built around a 185x50mm shock, but you can increase the stroke to 55mm and boost travel to 130mm. The frame is rated for a 120-140mm travel fork, which allows for different setup options, such as an XC whippet with 120/120mm travel or a rowdier trail bike with 140/130mm travel. I’m inclined to build the latter so, hopefully, I’ll have more on that sometime soon. If you wanted to have a mullet setup with a 27.5” rear wheel, that’s also possible with this new platform.
Returning to small refinements, the new Top Fuel is slightly more progressive than the previous generation and has a tad more anti-squat. Rear travel is kept at 120mm and comes with a 130mm travel fork up front. 29” wheels are standard on all frames except the small, which is built around 27.5” wheels. The internal storage has also been updated with larger openings and better weatherproof sealing, and cables have been kept out of the way to minimise snagging. Trek has won the applause of shop mechanics by keeping cables out of the headset and eliminating the Knock Block headset. A tried-and-true threaded BB is used, as well as bolt-on downtube armour and a rubber chainstay protector.
While there are slight changes to geometry, the 65.5° head angle remains consistent across all sizes. The effective seat tube angle ranges from 75.2-76.9°; Trek lists this angle based on a specific saddle height for each size. Another update is the size-specific rear centre lengths, which vary from 435mm (smaller frames) to 445mm (X-Large frames).
I had the pleasure of riding the new Top Fuel in Durango, Colorado, USA. Having more than a week based in Durango meant I could get very familiar with the bike, logging over fifteen hours of ride time. There’s plenty of pedalling needed in Durango, and often you’re either riding long climbs, flats and descents that have pedal sections. I thought this bike was well suited to the terrain. The first thing that struck me was the pedalling efficiency and overall zippiness of the bike. I rode twice a day locally and had two high-country long ride missions as well. On all occasions, from road to gravel to trail, I didn’t feel the need to hit the lockout lever, as it pedalled great with it wide open. The bike feels swift and light and climbs exceptionally well.
The Top Fuel’s adaptability is the new four- position Mino Link at the lower shock mount. Effectively, this set of flip chips allows riders to choose between permutations of high and low geometry, and more linear or more progressive suspension curves. Initially, for the first few days of riding around the mountain bike parks of Durango, I had the Top Fuel’s flip chip in its default ‘low, less progressive’ setting. As we headed for longer high-country rides, a simple flip of the chip meant I could steepen the head tube angle by .4° and raise the BB by 6mm. I found this setting was ideal for ramping-up. It offered adequate dampening and felt comfortable even after several hours in the saddle. The more progressive setting reigned supreme across rowdier terrain on the longer descents in Colorado’s high- country. The bike moves very swiftly, especially over long rides. I’m a big fan of the flip chip!
While the RockShox Pike fork nods to more trail-oriented riding, there’s something about the overall frame that makes it more compliant than the white paper stats indicate. This compliance was evident when we ventured into the backcountry, which made for lengthy and rowdy descents. These rides were often long – around three hours or more – so having a compliant frame was welcomed. These rowdy sections are when the bike feels burlier than presumed. Again, on descents, the Top Fuel chassis is bloody solid; with the bike’s light weight, this is a little surprising. But, when you throw that together with the progressive rear kinematics, it’s confidence inspiring. Bear in mind, when things get really real – rough and steep and you need to pick your line – apply a bit more effort to stay cantered and weight both axles. That said, the newly designed compliance of the frame and separate linkages means smoother, grippy moments when it matters most.
On the shorter, punchier rides in and around Durango’s extensive trail network, the bike was super smooth and sprightly. Heck, simply making your way to the trailhead, the Top Fuel is just as sharp – sprinting forward eagerly as soon as you put the slightest pressure on the pedals. Uphill, it’s just as powerful and lively. From more XC-oriented loops to bike park-style jumps and berms to rock slabs, with sketchy rocky descents, the rear end stays active, even under brake load. I think the key component is the four-bar suspension platform over a single- pivot flex-stay, which offers superior grip both uphill and downhill. There’s suitable snappiness, and the bike generates speed very well.
Standing is fine but, for seated climbing, the Top Fuel is a beast. It soaks up big roots and rocks without losing traction or bouncing you offline. On rockier technical climbs I would normally not make it, but it would clear them. Although it’s not technically an XC race focussed rig, the Top Fuel is a super capable climber. And, with it being so well balanced, you can pick your way through more technical sections without having to carry a lot of momentum in. Cornering aboard this rig is bloody fun too. Leaning into flatter corners and railing berms is awesome. The balanced ride pays off here – keeping an ideal amount of weight on both wheels which keeps it easy to judge traction.
The Bontrager Line Pro 30 OCLV Mountain Carbon wheels do a great job. They’re sprightly and engage swiftly. These wheels are laced with Bontrager Gunnison up front and Bontrager Montrose out back – these tyres keep in fitting with the bike’s lightweight theme. I found them super supple and quite zippy but, on gnarlier rockier sections, I had to choose my line. Whilst they didn’t give me any grief on rockier descents, choosing the best line was imperative, as I was a tad worried about snagging them. I can understand the thinking behind choosing to spec these tyres, but if the bike remained with me, I’d prefer something a little beefier – even with the weight penalty. In saying that, they did hook up well – and impressed me on faster rolling sections. I suppose it really depends on your application for this trail bike, as it’s up for wide interpretation.
Keeping with the parts and component’s theme – the RSL MTB Handlebar and Stem comes equipped on the Top Fuel. On trail, I found the RSL handlebar/stem combo to be quite comfortable. It wasn’t overly stiff nor super compliant; it sat in the middle somewhere, which was kind of great as meant I could focus on the ride. I quite liked the RSL bar’s good feel, with enough damping to keep your hands from taking too much abuse. It provided reasonable comfort and was plenty stiff when accelerating out-of-the-saddle. The sweep and rise were dialled for me, as I usually run a slightly forward roll on my bar, but it won’t suit everyone. Although I do love the super tidy aesthetics and feel of the Bontrager RSL integrated bar and stem, I do think perhaps a more traditional bar/stem combo would possibly suit more riders. As the rest of the bike has quite a lot of adjustability, it would be good to have the same within the cockpit. Such as swap a shorter stem for gravity focused days and a longer one for long ride days or racing.
SRAM’s XO Transmission does a flawless job of shifting. I did break the chain, however, and luckily we had another chain-link with us in the backcountry. But that can happen at any time, to any groupset. I have XO Transmission on my personal bike and it’s super robust, shifts flawlessly and you never have to faff with it! I think if you’re spending your hard-earned cash on a new bike, then having Transmission is definitely worth your consideration. SRAM Level Silver four- piston brakes, with 180mm HS2 rotors front and rear are on stopping duties. I did find these brakes fairly good for some of the riding, mainly around the mountain bike parks of Durango with shorter descents. However, on longer descents in the backcountry they weren’t powerful enough. Keep in mind, that was mainly on super long runs with chunder sections throughout. I have been riding SRAM Maven’s on my personal bike, so am a bit partial to a heavy hitting brake. Again, if the bike was mine, I would upgrade to a bigger front rotor and possibly swap these brakes to SRAM Codes.
This bike is bloody fun! Hands down one of the best bikes I’ve ridden this year. It’s sprightly but super capable. The balanced ride inspires a ton of confidence. It pedals everywhere super efficiently – dances uphill, generates speed across flats and shreds going down. Its more bike than you think and makes a strong case for having a shorter travel bike! Of course, there’s a few nit bits that could be addressed as I’ve mentioned but, overall, the new Top Fuel is all class. I’m very keen to build this bike as a burlier 140/130mm trail bike, so hopefully we can make that happen soon.
Commencal Meta V5
Words Lester Perry
Images Bevan Cowan
RRP $10,000
Distributor Commencal New Zealand
Since its creation in the year 2000, Commencal has been a mainstay in the downhill racing scene. Max Commencal, the BMIC (Big Man In Charge), enjoyed earlier success with SUNN Bicycles, a BMX company he formed in 1984. By the early 90’s, SUNN shifted its focus to Downhill MTB racing.
Beneath names like Nicolas Vouilloz, Anne- Caroline Chausson, Cedric Gracia, and other greats, the SUNN Downhill team amassed multiple world titles aboard their innovative downhill bikes.
Under the Commencal brand, their riders remain some of the sport’s winningest to this day; at any World Cup Downhill, across all categories, you’ll likely see a Commencal rider on the podium. This hunger for competition drives the development and direction of the now global, direct-to-consumer brand. The Meta V5 is a product of their Commencal Enduro Project and the four years of development under team riders that preceded its launch.
Development
Applying the same development theory and methods that brought downhill success, the Meta V5 was created to be Commencal’s comprehensive Enduro Race bike. Commencal aimed to provide their racers with one platform that would excel across all scenarios they’re presented with over an Enduro World Cup season. Alex Rudeau proved their development process was on point, securing himself five podium finishes and third overall in the 2023 Enduro World Series. The proof is in the pudding.
Frameset
Keeping with Commencal tradition, the frame is 100% alloy like the rest of their range—not a carbon fibre in sight. Rolling on 29er wheels, with 150mm rear travel and 160mm up front, this bike strikes the sweet spot of travel vs. pedalling ability and agility. Carrying speed is key to Enduro and the V5 delivers.
An alloy frame would be a prime candidate for a threaded bottom bracket but, for whatever reason, Commencal has stuck with a bb92 press- fit style. In fairness, I’d rather have a press-fit in an alloy frame than a carbon one, so I guess they’ve landed in a bit of a middle ground on the V5.
The frame features a plethora of tubing profiles; there is not a single ‘regular’ round tube anywhere. Depending on location, each tube is shaped to achieve specific strength, weight and compliance. Under the top tube is an accessory mount, and there’s a bottle cage mount situated in a small channel indented in the downtube tube. As is customary on most bikes today, a UDH hanger graces the dropouts.
The front and rear triangles connect with a series of bolts, bearings, and pivots that make up the VCS (Virtual Contact System) linkage. Ten bearings are spread through the swingarm’s five pivot points. The swingarm has some smart subtleties: bearing caps help keep grime out and expander plugs in the pivot axles help keep them tight. The lower end of the shock features a flip chip, allowing for a small amount of geometry customisation.
Let’s get through the details before looking at my thoughts after a couple of months aboard the V5:
Geometry
Although nothing jumps out as too progressive or outside the realms of sensibility when looking over the geometry chart for the Meta V5, there’s a lot to like. There’s a flip chip on the lower end of the rear shock, and other than a cursory couple of rides in ‘High’ to confirm there’s no massive difference between the two settings. I’ve stuck with the bike in ‘Low’, as I’d imagine most riders would do.
There’s nothing crazy here; I’d point out a middle-ground head angle and reasonably steep seat tube angle. As is becoming customary with Commencal’s bikes, the stack height is above average and pretty big for a medium-sized frame, a trend that seems to be taking hold with some brands.
The Ride:
According to the Commencal size chart, at 176cm tall, I sit right at the top of the Medium recommendation and at the bottom of the Large. With a bike of this ilk and travel category, I chose to go smaller rather than larger, and settled on the Medium size.
A couple of weeks after exchanging a emails with Commencal about how and where I ride, how long I’ve been riding, and what sort of rider I consider myself to be, a pre-tuned Meta V5 arrived on my doorstep. Frothing to get out, I quickly mounted the handlebars in the stem, attached the front wheel, and was good to go; the assembly only took about five minutes, including removing the bike from the box. A quick driveway test confirmed the supplied setup felt like it was in the ballpark of where I’d like it to be; they’d even trimmed the bars to my preferred 760mm width — bonus.
To give my thoughts some context, compared to my usual ride, this bike comes in at 10mm less travel on either end, a 14mm shorter reach, a 10mm higher stack, a 2-degree steeper seat tube, and almost equal chainstay length and head angles. Considering the 30mm riser bar, my hands end up roughly 30mm higher than my bike – quite a lot. Weight-wise, the Commencal comes in a little heavier, but not by an amount that makes a difference to anything; it adds to the feeling of stability. Considering how similar the geometry is between my bike and the Meta V5, they’re poles apart in how they ride.
I get on some bikes, and everything clicks immediately; this was one of them. Although I initially felt the shorter reach and higher front end compared to my bike, I quickly forgot these differences and was comfy on the bike after just a couple of runs down a trail. Not once have I felt like I wasn’t in the correct position on the bike or had to shift to a particular body position to get the bike to do what I wanted; everything just seems to click nicely, and now has me questioning my usual setup.
The suspension settings, as supplied, 71 psi in the fork and 177 in the shock, were ideal for getting to grips with the bike; nice and balanced, with no surprises. A couple of rides in, as I got used to the bike and speeds increased, I added a little air pressure front and rear and, taking this into account, slowed the rebound and added a click of compression damping to both front and rear. The Meta V5 is a full-gas Enduro bike and, although optimised for descending, you still have to make it to the top of a hill before heading back down. The Meta V5 is not a spritely climber, but it gets there. Out of the saddle, while under power, the suspension firms up substantially and gives an excellent platform to push against, i.e. when tackling steep technical climbs or sprinting over a punchy climb, it does both well. When I’m ticking my way up a gravel road or a long, smooth single-track climb, I’m immediately reaching for the lockout on the shock; the firm pedalling platform and steep seat tube make the climbing position comfortable and efficient.
Descending is a dream, highlighting some savvy design and an equally impressive suspension package. The VCS linkage is a virtual pivot linkage offering super plush suspension that’s supple off the top, offering wicked levels of grip; through the mid-stroke, it feels pretty linear but still has a good level of support. Even though it has 150mm of rear travel, it feels more over big hits or flat drops as it firms right up at the end of the stroke, preventing any harsh bottom outs, and I can’t think of a time when I’ve actually felt an abrupt end of the travel.
With all the links and pivots involved in the VCS, the rear end of the bike is quite wide to accommodate it all. It’s so wide, in fact, that it’s quite normal to drag my legs on it while riding. Not to the point of being annoying, but it’s noticeable and will inevitably rub and mark the frame over time. Fortunately, the bike I received has a tidy ride-wrap installed, so the paint isn’t affected.
I find the front end stiffer than many bikes, and the suspension works in combination with this front-end rigidity and the flex of the back end to provide a ride that’s quite unique, but only in good ways. While charging through rough sections, the bike remains composed with amazing stability and with no harshness or the feeling of being deflected off obstacles or ‘pinged’ off square edges. The chassis floats across the chunder, reacting more to rider input than the trail feedback. Thanks to this, I felt less fatigue on long descents, feeling there was no need to wrestle the bike to stay on line or keep it where I wanted, I could just stand centred on the bike and let it do the work.
Considering the weight, travel and reasonably linear mid-stroke suspension kinematics, the Meta is surprisingly lively and is fun to pop off trail features and manual through sections; even though it’s such a sled, it strikes a surprising balance of high-speed downhill capability and mellow trail cornering agility and playfulness.
The overall balanced feel lends itself to aggressive and controlled cornering. Initiating turns or quickly changing direction is simple, not requiring any dramatic weight shifts to maintain traction.
Adding to the predictability and stability is some well-engineered flex in the back end, that works in harmony with the suspension. Much like the Cannondale Habit LT I reviewed a few months back, there’s an amount of lateral flex in the swingarm. Still, tuned compliance has significant advantages, particularly at this mid-travel level. It helps keep the bike composed in the rough and gets across off-camber more smoothly by assisting the wheel to stay on the ground rather than being deflected off bumps (where stiffer bikes would rely more heavily on just the suspension to move the wheel). I’m not sure this trait is necessarily faster in itself, but the resulting reduction in fatigue over the long run is certainly noticeable.
One thing that struck me early on was how quiet the bike is. Thanks to substantial chainstay and seat stay bumpers and tidy cable routing, the bike maintains a nice, dull sound when on the trails. By the look of those bumpers, the chain is still hitting them while slapping around, but they’re doing their job well and keeping sounds muted.
On my second ride, the frame developed the dreaded and much-publicised creaking in one of the pivots. Considering the bike had a pre- review strip down and grease, this was quite a surprise. Thankfully, after going through the involved process of getting to each pivot bolt and re-tightening them (it’s a total faff to do), the creak faded out. It seems the pivots will need some attention every 4-6 weeks, depending on the conditions they’re ridden in. I’ve had similar experiences on other alloy bikes in the past, and it seems to be part and parcel of alloy frames; when compared to a carbon frame, a bit more care and attention are necessary to keep pivots clean, tight, and creak-free, this Commencal is no different.
I’m not a fan of the Fidlock drink bottle that was supplied. Unfortunately, without customising a bottle cage, there’s no way to carry another bottle style in the front triangle. It’s much fiddlier than a standard bottle to put back in its holster after a sip. The saddle isn’t terrible, but it’s on the firmer end of the scale and, after a couple of hours pedalling up hills, it doesn’t agree with my backside; it may be my preference, but I’d like something a bit softer.
Like many others, the Commencal product managers missed a beat when it comes to the dropper post. At 175mm, it’s not the shortest drop around but, even with my 720mm seat height, a 200mm post would fit. Adjustable dropper posts are available, and I’d love to see one on this bike to maximise the drop and allow riders to fine-tune it to their needs.
The DT Swiss EX1700 wheelset hasn’t skipped a beat, and I continue to be impressed by DT’s pre-built wheelsets. The Schwalbe Tacky Chan tyres have been great for conditions at my local riding spots recently. The Ultra Soft (front) and Soft (rear) are a perfect combination, providing excellent traction in all scenarios and trails I’ve had them on. All things considered, they roll surprisingly well, although they’re showing signs of wear pretty quickly. I’ll be interested to see how they go in proper mud rather than the hero dirt of late, particularly as they’ve already lost their square edges.
Final thoughts
Riding the Meta confirmed that the old adage “fast is fun, fun is fast” couldn’t be truer for this bike. It’s easy to get it to go fast downhill, and I’ve found myself off the brakes through sections I’m usually slightly more apprehensive about. Combine this increased confidence with the agility and playfulness of the bike, and it ticks a lot of boxes for me. If you’re considering a new ride, the Meta V5 would be worth considering and, provided you’re happy to keep the rear end serviced, I’d confidently say that — much like me — you’d be stoked on this bike!
Abus Airdrop MIPS Helmet
Words Lester Perry
Image Cameron Mackenzie
RRP $579
Distributor Southern Approach
Full-face helmets underwent a revolution a few years ago, splitting camp. One took the full-gas, maximum protection, downhill helmet route, and the other headed down a more Enduro-focused, breezier, lighter-weight but marginally less protective road.
Although still popular with the Enduro crowd, lightweight full-face helmets are being snapped up by eMTBers all over the globe; the extra protection offering more peace of mind should a 20+kg bike smack you on the head during an accident.
The ABUS Airdrop MIPS hits my test scales at 804g, putting it towards the heavier end of the lightweight full-face category; however, as with most things, the scale alone doesn’t tell the entire story.
Internally, we find a traditional MIPs liner; it’s well-fitted to the shell and under regular use there is no noticeable movement between the EPS shell and MIPs liner. On the rear, we find a familiar dial adjust for a customised fit, although there’s no vertical adjustment to the harness, so it may not suit all head shapes perfectly. The internal padding is soft on the skin, and cheek pads snap into place simply and are easy to remove should you want to during a long, hot liaison – or for cleaning. The inside of the chin bar is lined with closed cell foam to help soften the blow should you take a big front on impact. This padding wraps up the shell slightly in a section in line with the wearer’s collarbones; the theory is to blunt the helmet’s impact on your collarbone should they make contact during a big crash. I haven’t put this feature to the test, but it does seem like it would work. The closure is a secure, tried and true, classic double-d-ring style; a somewhat fiddly but proven system.
A fashionably large and adequately adjustable visor is bolted in place but designed to “break away” in the event of a crash, drastically reducing its leverage on a wearer’s neck. The visor itself seems sturdy and has stood up to a bit of abuse; less could be said about many, more brittle visors out there.
Having reviewed other ABUS helmets previously, I went for the same S/M size, with a 52-58cm size range. The Airdrop is certainly a snugger fit, though, and I had the adjuster wound the entire way out. Even then, I found the shell was only just large enough for my head. Without trying it, the larger L/XL size shell would have been quite a step up, and I like the comparatively slim silhouette of the S/M size. Provided my head doesn’t grow then this size is comfy enough.
I was surprised by how much airflow the helmet offered, particularly considering the traditional MIPS liner usually disrupts airflow. The combination of large frontal air intakes, the strategically placed internal channelling, and the large rear exhaust ports worked exceptionally well.
I was surprised by how much airflow the helmet offered, particularly considering the traditional MIPS liner usually disrupts airflow. The combination of large frontal air intakes, the strategically placed internal channelling, and the large rear exhaust ports worked exceptionally well. I could feel the air passing over my head, even on muggy late spring days; I found it more breathable than some helmets I’ve worn with more vents. Vents just above the ears are a nice touch, offering virtually uninterrupted sound, so you can easily hear your mates yelling at you to “get off the brakes!” Or maybe that’s just me?
I’ve yet to come across a full-face that doesn’t work well with goggles, and the Airdrop is no different. However, depending on how large your goggle frame is, there may be limited space from the top of the frame to the forehead of the helmet, so it’s worth checking whether your specific setup would work. Not all full-faces play nicely with glasses; however, should you want to go down that route, the two work just fine together on the Airdrop.
The Airdrop meets all the necessary safety standards here in NZ, but I wonder how much it exceeds them by? It’s something we’ll never know. Still, with fewer vents than some popular models and more ‘meat’ (and consequently weight) across key areas, my bro-science would tell me that this helmet may lean further toward a downhill helmet than some brethren. I won’t delve too deep into the subject, but there is a sticker inside the lid touting that ‘the chin bar meets ASTM F1952 Standard Certification’; essentially a certification for downhill helmets that are tested to a higher level than the usual standards we see.
The fact ABUS claims the chin bar passes this certification leaves some grey area as to whether or not the entire helmet meets the standard. This standard is tested across an entire helmet, not just a single area, like the chin bar. The bottom line is, the helmet is more than sufficient for its use case, and there’s some added comfort in the fact it also meets at least some of the ASTM F1952 standard.
I’ve been impressed with the ABUS Airdrop. It’s light enough, plenty breezy, has some nice features, and looks unique amongst all the popular models seen out on the trails. I’ve even had several questions and comments about how good it looks!
The fit won’t suit everyone, so if you think you’d be on the crossover between sizes, be sure to try both to ensure the best fit.
Weldtite Chain Lubes
Words & Image Lester Perry
RRP $19
Distributor Southern Approach
Weldtite has a storied history. Starting out in London in the early 1940s, it initially manufactured and supplied puncture repair kits to British and Canadian paratroopers who, once on the ground, were getting about on folding bikes.
Eventually outgrowing its facility, Weldtite shifted to Barton, by the River Humber in North Lincolnshire, where it continues to develop and manufacture a wide range of bike maintenance products, to this day.
A lot has changed in the world of chain lubricants over recent years. New formulations, wet, dry, light, drip or melt; there’s now a lube for whatever style of bike you ride and whatever conditions you ride it in, not to mention options for both human and electric assist bikes as well. Whatever the style of lube or the name on the label, they’re all attempting to achieve the same goals: quieten the drive train, increase its efficiency, maximise its lifespan, and not attract contaminants.
I’ve spent a few months comparing the merits of two similar – but distinctly different – Weldtite chain lubes. Using multiple bikes and varied trail conditions, I’ve garnered a good understanding of each lube’s drawbacks and benefits.
Weldtite Ceramic Lube
This is an all-weather lube with ceramic additives for optimal efficiency, helping to conserve precious watts and decrease drivetrain wear. Its low viscosity allows it to penetrate right into the links of the chain, and its various additives bond to the chain’s surfaces, creating a hydrophobic barrier to resist water and contamination.
It’s reasonably light and has a runny consistency, so care was needed while applying it. I found it easy to overdo it, leaving the entire drive train susceptible to build-up of dirt and other contaminants. It literally only takes a small drop on each chain link to do its job. Once I figured the sweet spot between ‘too much’ and ‘not enough’, this lube was great. As with other lubes, one key to gunk-free riding is to begin with a completely clean system (chainrings, chain, jockey wheels), then apply the lube, leave it to sit a few hours, and finish by giving the chain a thorough wipe to remove any excess sitting on the outer surfaces.
In dry conditions, the drivetrain stayed clean, smooth, and quiet for many rides, with minimal gunk on the chainring or jockey wheels. I’ve been surprised at how well the lube has lasted; it could go multiple rides before needing to reapply. In wetter conditions, I found it didn’t last quite as long, although the bonus in the damp was how little grime the drivetrain collected, certainly less than many lubes I’ve used.
On a mountain bike, I’d reach for this lube over the summer, in dry to variable conditions. I’d run this lube year-round on a road or gravel bike.
I’d say it’s a jack of all trades, master of none.
Weldtite All-weather Lube with Teflon™
This lube is designed to excel when the trails or roads are wet, or rain is falling. It has a marginally thicker consistency than the Ceramic lube but is still quite runny. The All-weather is a bit stickier than the Ceramic Lube, closer to a more traditional ‘wet’ style lube. Weldtite tells us the lube is enhanced with a ‘Teflon Surface Protector’ to assist in repelling water and contaminants.
A light application is vital – it’s not as sticky as some all-weather lubes, but if there’s much on the outer surfaces of the chain (or overspill on chainring or jockey wheels), these areas attract contaminants. As with the ceramic lube, I began with a clean chain and applied a thin layer across the chin, leaving a few hours to wipe off any excess before riding. With such a small amount needed per use, the 100ml bottle should last even the most frequent of riders for a long time.
Amongst my normal cruising around, I rode this lube on one big (by my standards) overnight mission – some 19 hours of riding split in two by a particularly broken sleep in a roadside shelter…. but that’s a story for another time. Across multiple surfaces and trail types, from groomed gravel to stodgy mud, my drivetrain got a good workout and offered a real-world glimpse of what this lube is all about. There was no sign of the chain drying out, and at no point did the drivetrain seem like it needed more lube, staying quiet for the entire ride. By the time I rolled back into my garage at home, there was some buildup of contamination on the chainring and jockey wheels, although it was not a concern given the conditions and hours ridden. Had I taken the time to give the chain and jockey wheels a quick once over after my first day of riding, I could have saved some precious watts being absorbed by some of that buildup.
Given its chequered reputation, it would be remiss of me not to mention the use of Teflon (PTFE) in chain lube. A portion of the bike industry is removing PTFE and related compounds from their products, claiming no justifiable case exists for their continued use. A solid body of evidence shows that the PFAS used in the manufacture of PTFE, and the PTFE itself, are growing global health concerns. Both compounds are termed ‘forever chemicals’ and cannot completely break down in the environment. There’s a host of studies and evidence online if you’d like to know more about why this is a concern.
So, where does that leave me with the Weldtite All-weather chain lube? I’d say it’s a jack of all trades, master of none. This lube quiets the drivetrain, withstands terrible weather, and lasts well, but the drawback is that it picks up a bit more muck while doing its slippery job than some lubes targeted toward more specific conditions. This could be right up your alley if you’re keen on one lube to use across multiple bikes without matching lube type to conditions.
SRAM Maven ULT Brakes
Words Lester Perry
Images Lester Perry & Callum Wood
RRP $622 per end
Distributor Worralls
It’s been a while since I came across a new bike component that, once bolted on, offered a noticeable performance improvement from its predecessor. Often new releases are more of “a tweak here, a tweak there, and a splash of paint” rather than a complete redo, ending up with something vastly better than what was offered before.
In the space of just 12 months, SRAM has done just that – offering two groundbreaking new ranges, first with the launch of the Transmission ecosystem in March 2023, and now with the recent release of the Maven series of brakes.
The first and fundamental change that SRAM made at the outset of its quest for top performance was to design the system using mineral oil rather than its traditional DOT fluid. DOT fluid absorbs moisture over time, and its use means more regular brake bleeds as the oil’s properties eventually change as moisture is taken on. After a couple of years, the seals, particularly in the lever, needed replacement as they are ultimately eroded or swollen by the DOT fluid, rendering the brakes useless. Unfortunately, the cost to replace the seals is about equal to just replacing the entire lever (unless you do the job yourself), so guess where all these old brakes end up? Mineral fluid isn’t corrosive and doesn’t absorb moisture like the DOT so, theoretically, less maintenance is required, and the brakes will last a lot longer.
The combination of the new seal material and the mineral oil offers better performance across the heat spectrum in which the brakes operate. From the depths of a Queenstown autumnal inversion layer – where brakes may never heat up a lot – to lengthy laps on Whistler steeps, the idea is to offer a brake that performs more consistently across a wider variety of running temperatures and with less maintenance. The new seals and use of mineral fluid, combined with larger pistons and a new, gargantuan calliper, seem to have achieved this – from my experience so far.
For a brake to be powerful and consistent, it needs to keep enough heat in the system without overheating or excess cooling; not be too hot, not too cold, just right – like a good bowl of porridge. The greater thermal mass in the Maven calliper takes longer to heat up but, by design, balances the peaks and troughs of temperature, maintaining a more consistent and optimal temperature, ultimately providing a more consistent braking performance regardless of how hard you are on the brakes.
There’s a nice, solid, woody feel, and you can tell when the pads contact the rotor. There’s a familiar feeling of modulation, just like other high-end SRAM offerings.
We installed a set of Maven ULT on my daily driver, a Trek Slash, and over the past few months I’ve been figuring out what they’re all about. I’ve been running the stock organic pads and 200mm HT2 rotors. In the past, with SRAM brakes, the stock organic pads would be first to go, instantly upgrading to a sintered option. In this case, I’ve had no complaints with the Maven’s stock organic pad compound. Apparently, like previous SRAM offerings, the sintered pads come into their own in wet conditions, but so far I haven’t seen the need to put the sintered pads to the test on these brakes.
There’s a limited edition Maven Expert ‘red splash anodised’ colourway that Liam (editor) has been running but, honestly, that red would have clashed brutally with my orange bike, so the polished silver and black version ULT suits my setup perfectly – and we all know looks are part of the performance package, right?
The lever feel is not too dissimilar to the latest SRAM Codes. There’s a nice, solid, woody feel, and you can tell when the pads contact the rotor. There’s a familiar feeling of modulation, just like other high-end SRAM offerings. With some heat in the system at speed, the lever remains comfortably consistent and doesn’t wander or pump up. Wet weather is no bother either. The combo of the 200mm rotor and the huge pad contact area provides awesome wet-weather power.
It’s nice to see a slight tweak in how the brake hose exits the lever body; compared to the Code’s ‘Stealth’ levers, the hose comes out of the lever and angles away from the handlebar rather than towards it like other Stealth style brakes. Having ridden bikes with the standard, angled ‘Stealth’ levers and their regular ‘slap’ noise as the brake hose smacked on the bars, I was glad to see this minor tweak. I’ll be interested to see if this change rolls into the rest of the ‘Stealth’ levers over time.
The Maven ULT edition features lever reach and pad contact adjustment. Although the lever looks quite similar to the Code Stealth lever, inside the lever body we find the necessary differences, including piston size, to optimise for the Maven calliper’s oversized pistons.
My favoured setup is to have the pad contact wound completely in (so the pads contact quickly) and the lever wound far enough in that it ends up near parallel to the handlebar, allowing for minimal reach and only a small lever throw before pads engage. The lever pull feels slightly firmer than a SRAM Code and considerably firmer than a Shimano brake. It’s a matter of getting used to it rather than better or worse in my book, and I’ve been running Shimano 4-pot brakes up until this set arrived.
The Maven is touted as providing almost 50% more stopping power and requiring about 30% less force on the lever to deliver the same power as the Code Ultimate brakes – some heady stats that, before riding them, I found a bit hard to swallow. After a couple of months aboard the brakes, however, I can’t argue with these numbers; there is a serious amount of stopping power on tap and my forearms aren’t complaining.
In seasons gone by, it’s been common to see downhill and enduro racers’ bikes fitted with the largest rotor size they could squeeze into their frames. Part of the impetus behind making the Maven’s so powerful was the aim to be able to scale down the power by running smaller rotors. Smaller rotors are less susceptible to rock or debris strikes, so staying straighter and having so much power on offer gives a rider the ability to tune their power to their needs depending where or how they’re riding.
With no worry of underpowered or overcooked brakes, there’s no reason not to brake later towards turns or go deeper into a chute before braking.
Weight-wise, there’s an additional 60 grams per end on the ULT above a comparable level Code brake (calliper, hose, lever); my trusty calculator tells me that’s a 20% increase. It is considerable, especially when most of the extra weight is in the calliper. In fairness, depending on what size rotors are fitted, and whether or not they require adaptors, you could end up with a similar (or even lighter) total system weight compared to a Code with larger rotors. But, with more power and more consistent performance.
As you see, there’s a load of tech to unpack with an entirely new offering like the Mavens, but if what you really care about is how these units work in the real world, then read on.
There’s no doubt these brakes are the gruntiest I’ve used. I’ve ridden several powerful gravity- oriented brakes, but by no means a majority of what is available. The Mavens have surprised me, not just with their raw power but with how consistent the feel is; every time I’ve pulled the lever, the feel is the same and, even on longer runs where other brakes have suffered with heat issues or cooked rotors, I’ve learned to rely on the consistency of the Maven.
With immense power comes immense responsibility. Traction is more critical during heavy braking, and part of this is maintaining body position – something that takes some adjustment. With no worry of underpowered or overcooked brakes, there’s no reason not to brake later towards turns or go deeper into a chute before braking. Braking in a shorter distance means higher forces on the body and tyres over a shorter time span than lesser brakes – think a Stab rather than a Slice – and certainly something that takes some time to become familiar with.
Anchors on = slow down. Full stop. No story, straight to bed.
It’s taken some time to adapt my riding and change my ingrained habits to make the most of the Mavens, but it does feel like if I were against the clock, I’d see some time savings, particularly on high-speed and steep tracks.
With some heat in the system at speed, the lever remains comfortably consistent and doesn’t wander or pump up. Wet weather is no bother either.
On most eBikes I’ve ridden recently, the brakes have underwhelmed me. An adequate brake has often been let down by an inadequate rotor, and it’s been quickly cooked, rendering it nearly useless. Generally the brakes just aren’t consistently grunty enough for the weight they need to slow down. A note to product managers: a 180mm rotor doesn’t belong on an eBike! The additional heft of a complete eBike system (rider, gear, bike) makes a set of Mavens for eBike use a total no-brainer and a worthy upgrade.
As good as the Mavens are, they’re not for every bike, and for sure, they’re too powerful for some scenarios. In slick conditions, I think I’d like to try smaller rotors to detune their bite somewhat. Such powerful brakes make it a bit harder to keep the wheels rotating under braking when trails are super wet, and lockups come easy when there’s this much power at such little effort. Likewise, unless the brakes are fitted to a downhill bike, or you’re riding long, steep trails on an Enduro bike, then you’ll likely want to de-tune them to the point where their performance (outside of the mineral oil and heat advantages) would put them in line with a Code or similar brake. On anything less than a balls-to-the-wall Enduro or Downhill bike, where maximum power isn’t essential, I’d be reaching for a Code or something similar.
Spending time on these brakes has got me thinking; SRAM now offers eBike tuned suspension (under the Rock Shox brand), transmission drivetrain, Maven brakes, and even a collaboratively developed eMTB motor. Combine these bits with other brands in the SRAM family: such as ZIPP wheels, Truvativ cockpit, Time pedals, and a Hammerhead bike computer. These are all arguably top-shelf and market-leading (or close to it) items that all suit the eMTB market to a tee. There are only two pieces to the puzzle missing: a good set of tyres and a frame…. Hmmm what will the future hold?
Wheelworks TrailLite Carbon
Words & Image Lance Pilbrow
RRP $3600
Distributor Wheelworks
Way back in November 2022, I was lucky enough to get my hands on not one, but two sets of Wheelworks’ new wheels to review. These were the Flite Trail model; one set in carbon and another in alloy. The idea was to do something of a side-by-side test on each pair over the summer and write something up for print after giving them each a good thrashing.
Needless to say, they both flew through the tests (and I did an unusual amount of wheel and tyre swapping that summer). At the end of that I was a little torn; the carbons were lighter, stiffer and no doubt, won on bling, but the alloys provided serious value for money, and Wheelwork’s after (and before) sales support meant that either way, you would no doubt be a satisfied customer.
Even better, though, was the opportunity to hold on to one of the sets for a long-term review. “Are you interested in holding onto these $3000 wheels for a bit longer?” they asked. “Ah… Um, yeah!” (What kind of question is that?) By now I had grown quite attached to the carbon Flite Trail wheels, and though I knew one day I would inevitably have to give them back, I was going to do everything I could to put that day off for as long as possible.
Many readers might be unaware that long-term reviews of high-end products are not all that common in this industry. Often, something arrives, you have it for a month and then it’s back on the courier again to the distributor to be used in a demo fleet, or to be sent to another media organisation for them to do their own review. It’s just the way the industry works. However, these long-term reviews are the sort of reviews I think most people would like to see more of.
We all know most products will work just fine for a month, but a year or 18 months down the track? That’s when the cracks begin to show, and that’s the kind of information you really want to know when you open a magazine for advice.
So, enough background, but suffice to say, props to Wheelworks for believing in their product enough to trust it to be reviewed over almost 18 months.
A quick recap: the TrailLite Carbon wheelset comes in at 30mm internal / 36mm external width and it runs 28mm high. The wheelset I rode weighed in at 1650g grams including rim tape and valves installed. The carbon rims were matched to Wheelwork’s own Dial hubs and laced with DT Swiss Aerolite spokes. Mine came with red decals on the hubs, a small red ‘TL’ (TrailLite) icon, and a larger, silver Wheelworks logo that follows the arc of the rim. These are all customisable to match whatever colourway your bike is, because we all like to be matchy-matchy. They came pre-taped and with valves installed.
As I mentioned in the earlier review, Wheelworks really are all about wheels. That’s their sole focus, and that focus is part of what makes purchasing a set of wheels more engaging than just scrolling through an endless list of options on the internet. It’s personal. Prior to getting the wheels, I spoke with their team about my riding style, bike, weight, and what I was hoping to achieve or improve over my current set up. This conversation dictated the build, and having their expertise guide the process means that, as a buyer, you are going to be massively confident in what is a significant purchase.
after 18 months of testing they really are still running as good as new; a real testament to the strength and layup of the carbon, and the craftsmanship involved in the build.
So, 18 months in, how did they fair? Well, I’ve got to be honest… the Wheelworks decals have started to show some signs of wear. A travesty! Jokes aside, that is quite literally the only thing I can fault them on. Over the review period, I rode a Whaka 50, a Whaka100, some Enduro, as well as 18 months of just everyday regular riding. In that time I cased more jumps than I would like to admit and did zero maintenance on them. I had no reason to. In terms of ride quality, what I was most taken aback by was the impressive lateral stiffness and how that enabled me to track a line through uneven terrain; and the awesome acceleration they enabled.
When the day finally came to send them back, I thought I should see just what state they were in, just in case I needed to send an apologetic email to the Wheelworks team before they unboxed them at their end. Grabbing a few zip ties to make an impromptu wheel alignment jig, I realised that, yep, they’re still dead straight. I ran my fingers over the Dial hub bearings and, yep, still silky smooth – smoother in fact than when they even arrived. I am honestly really impressed. To be fair, these are a $3600 product so, yeah, I would expect them to be faultless, for a good long time. But mountain biking is a sport that is tough on gear. We seem to keep on asking our gear to be lighter, whilst also being stronger – and wheels are a perfect example of this. At some point, something has to give…. Unless there is a real commitment to maintaining quality and not cutting corners. I think the Wheelworks wheels hit the sweet spot with this. As I said, they weigh in around 1650gm. I think this is bang on for most trail riders. They feel light enough to have that ‘zip’ about them (and to also feel like you have a slightly unfair advantage over your mates in the Whaka100), but clearly still enough strength to go the distance. I wouldn’t say I ‘abused’ these wheels (especially not on record as I would quite like them to send me other wheels to review… ahem… Berd’s?) as, to be honest, I’m just not that sort of rider, but I like to think I ride pretty hard when I’m in the zone and often kid myself into believing I’m a better rider than I actually am…. That combo means that at least once, on most rides, I have that moment of wincing as I slam into a root or rock and think “doh! that is going to be a cracked rim.” But, after 18 months of testing, they really are still running as good as new; a real testament to the strength and layup of the carbon, and the craftsmanship involved in the build.
All in all, this is probably one of the least surprising reviews most of our readers will read. My final thoughts after 18 months of solid testing; Wheelworks wheels are great. About as surprising as saying water is wet. Wheelworks have built a business based around their reputation; a reputation for building consistently solid wheelsets, for backing them up with an outstanding warranty and after sale support and, ultimately, for creating a culture of really valuing their customers. When you do that wheelset after wheelset, it’s no wonder they are so consistently recommended.
Bosch SX: Is this the new natural?
Words Nathan Petrie
Images Cameron Mackenzie
Looks can be deceiving. Something may appear small or neat, but take a peak under the hood
and you’ll find something much greater
In the bike world, we lust after the lightest (and latest) technology but, at the same time, we never want to give up that purity of the ‘natural’ ride feel. At the forefront of our communal infatuation with ‘bike porn’ is the eBike. Is it possible to embrace the technology without giving up on the simple joy we get from pedalling a bike?
Since Covid, eBikes have become commonplace on our trails and the daily ride for many of us. The maturing market now provides a wide range of eBike products for every style of rider. From full-power to lightweight motor options, a variety of battery sizes, and matched with different bike brand geometry. Bosch has led this charge and the arrival of their Performance Line SX system in New Zealand is the next phase of this evolution.
When the opportunity came through to test ride the new Mondraker Dune R, equipped with Bosch’s Performance Line SX, my interest was well and truly piqued. My current bike is fitted with the Performance Line CX, and I knew the SX was a light-weight system, so was keen to see how it would compare. We headed for the rugged terrain of Matangi Station in Alexandra, to put it through its paces; the perfect proving ground for both the system and bike with steep climbs, tight pinches and rocky single track.
My most obvious question was how the SX motor would feel in terms of assistance compared to my experience on the Performance Line CX. Would it feel underpowered or too much of a jump down? How natural would it feel to ride? I was also interested to see how you use the modes. For the type of riding I do, I usually ride my CX bike in the two lowest modes, Eco and Tour, but I wondered if I’d need to use eMTB or Turbo? Or, if I stuck to my usual modes, how fast would I be able to climb up stuff? Would I feel like I was going a whole lot slower? Would the SX system experience be up to Bosch’s usual high standards?
I put the motor to the test straight out of the car park, climbing up a steep four-wheel drive track to access the trails. I didn’t expect the SX to be as strong as a full-power motor like the CX but it was easily powerful enough going up. I didn’t need to switch to eMTB or Turbo mode. Even on the loose gravel surface, where you can easily lose traction on the steep sections, the bike performed well and I could push through without having to get out of the saddle.
I think a lot of experienced riders still yearn for that analogue bike feel and the lower-powered modes deliver that nice balance of assistance.
On an eBike, you can sometimes feel like the front wheel is going to lift off on steep sections, especially in high power modes, but I didn’t experience any of that pull-up at the front. I felt like you could manage the torque and it was well delivered. It was smooth and consistent and didn’t come on in a big burst.
I had heard that the SX is more cadence- sensitive but even so I didn’t have to spin it up as quickly as I thought I might have to and was getting good assistance low down. It wasn’t hard to get used to it either. I just had to drop down one gear and I was set. I was still covering the ground fast and it felt really natural.
My personal preference when it comes to modes on my CX powered bike is to be in Tour mode 80% of the time, maybe eMTB mode if I’m going up a more sustained technical climb. I never really feel like I need Turbo and I hardly ever use it. I love to pedal but still want that assistance when I need it. I think a lot of experienced riders still yearn for that analogue bike feel and the lower-powered modes deliver that nice balance of assistance. Eco and Tour don’t feel super strong on a heavier bike so I thought I’d see how they felt on the SX. I switched to Tour on the steep sections and it was ideal, giving me the assistance I needed.
I had a try with eMTB and Turbo and found they were good for starting on a steep technical climb, getting you into it without feeling too strong. This is where these modes come into their own. In the spots where you’re at a low cadence and can run out of traction pretty easily, those high- power modes can help you get moving without having to worry about spinning the wheel and losing grip straight away. You get the torque that you need, where you need it. With eMTB mode you can get up and over most things and it’s the most intuitive mode for most types of riding.
The PowerMore 250 range extender is a good size, weighing in at just 1.5kg and sits on the bottle cage mount. Even though you’re carrying the minimal extra weight, you’re not going to be suffering anymore because you’ve still got the assistance from the motor and the bike is already lighter.
In the morning, we used about 40% of the battery, then rode three hours in the afternoon on some pretty steep, techy terrain, all on one battery charge and I never felt any range anxiety. We didn’t have the Bosch PowerMore range extender with us, but it would be ideal on big days like this. Having the option of an extra 250Wh on top of the 400Wh from the Bosch CompactTube 400 that comes on the Mondraker Dune R is a huge bonus.
The PowerMore 250 range extender is a good size, weighing in at just 1.5kg and sits on the bottle cage mount. Even though you’re carrying the minimal extra weight, you’re not going to be suffering anymore because you’ve still got the assistance from the motor and the bike is already lighter. It’s much easier to add 1.5kg to your backpack than a full-size second battery and it widens the scope for more ambitious backcountry missions.
The Mondraker Dune R has a system controller installed in the top tube, so you can do a quick glance down to check how much battery you’ve got left and what mode you’re in. I liked not having a display unit to clutter the cockpit. But if you prefer having a display unit you can have this added on. Having a minimalist eBike setup with only the system controller and mini remote, but the Flow App in your pocket, means you’re getting the best of both worlds: a pure riding experience with the reassurance of powerful data in your pocket so you can quickly crunch big numbers if you need to. The Mini Remote next to the grip is great. If you’re in a tough spot where you need to change the mode easily and quickly, it behaves responsively.
Going on a deep dive on the bike itself, The Dune R is a solid package. Mondraker has three tiers of the Dune R and this is the most affordable. Build-wise, this is in line with what you would expect at this price point. The headset was super clean with the internal cable routing; that was a nice touch and didn’t impact the steering range. Having the 180mm fork on the front means it’s quite a burly bike. I had thought it would be a bit of a handful but was pleasantly surprised on some of the tighter spots we rode; it still felt light and manoeuvrable and handling was really good. Mondraker uses their own patented dual link suspension design where the shock is compressed at both ends. This gives the bike amazing pedalling efficiency, a very progressive nature. It felt lively and responsive, firm but still plush. It was also very quiet and the build quality was immaculate. The geometry was that classic Mondraker style from their race pedigree – an aggressive approach for descents where you’re tucked in but, if you’re sitting down climbing, it puts you in a good spot. Mondraker also has a unique approach to its high-end carbon bikes. They use pure Toray Carbon with a unique layup to achieve low weight, high strength and stiffness. Most carbon frames are composites where carbon is mixed with fibreglass, so this is very solid. The bike itself really is an amazing first pairing with the Bosch SX system. I think the overall aggressive approach of the Dune makes this a compelling option.
After riding this bike, I asked myself who the bike and – specifically – the Bosch SX system could be suited to?
For advanced riders, the eBike choices are really interesting now, especially if you’re someone who’s come from an acoustic bike. This bike and system is not such a drastic jump as it would be to a full-powered eBike. It has a super-natural feel; you’re taking an analogue experience and you’re just giving it enough assistance but not in a heavy- handed way. Likewise for existing eBike riders, this presents a really different ride experience.
This system will suit someone who loves technical climbing and still wants the capability to manoeuvre, but understands that it is going to ride like a trail bike on the descents as well. It has got the right amount of torque, you can spend most of your time using the low assist modes but with the reassurance that you can bump up to eMTB when you need it and dial it back down when you don’t. Even if you’re riding with people on non-eBikes you can still chuck it in the lowest mode and ride quite naturally in a mixed group, which is sometimes difficult to do with a full-powered eBike.
This system will suit someone who loves technical climbing and still wants the capability to manoeuvre, but understands that it is going to ride like a trail bike on the descents as well.
I think this could be the ultimate system for backcountry and hike-a-bike missions. The SX has plenty of torque and power, so you can climb the more unusual trails you come across on backcountry outings – and having the option of the range extender gives you that certainty of range. An eBike assists you in exploring places you otherwise wouldn’t reach, but there are always sections where you’re going to have to carry your bike over deep river crossings, where trees are down or you’re navigating a washout. Hauling a bike over that unexpected stuff can be taxing and this is where the weight is really important. Walk mode with the lighter weight system is also a breeze.
To sum up, it was an amazingly fun experience to ride this eBike and I was well and truly surprised at its capability. I was already familiar with the Bosch system so the SX felt comfortable while also bringing in some new experiences. Everything was developed to the expected high standard, from the overall system to the Flow App. I think the SX system fills a really broad part of the market and it actually strengthens where its full-powered CX offering fits. Once people ride it, it will change a lot of mindsets. The system that bridges both the eBike and the analogue worlds – you can have your cake and eat it too. This is the new natural.
Special thanks to Outside Sports, Matangi Station and Mondraker NZ (Allsports Distribution).
The Mondraker Dune R is available for purchase at outsidesports.co.nz and nationwide. For a full list of Mondraker NZ retailers visit mondraker.co.nz